home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: rapidnet.com!wblock
- From: wblock@rapidnet.com (Warren Block)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: A3000 SCSI questions
- Date: 27 Jan 1996 16:29:00 GMT
- Organization: RapidNet
- Message-ID: <4edjsc$49v@rapidnet.com>
- References: <4crkgh$ct6@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <4djffa$bau@rapidnet.com> <4dlre0$jad@news.sdd.hp.com> <4e0amr$nph@rapidnet.com> <4e0jru$16d@news.sdd.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: rapidnet.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Jeff Grimmett (jgrimm@sdd.hp.com) wrote:
- : wblock@rapidnet.com (Warren Block) wrote:
-
- : >Unless you have two controllers, you only have one SCSI bus, and the SCSI
- : >spec is very clear on termination and the other rules (a couple of which
- : >C= broke on the A3000).
-
- : So theory and reality collide, and guess what? Reality wins again.
-
- No, C= chose to do a couple of things wrong, and the users are the ones
- who had to put up with it. As usual. To be fair, there may not have
- been any conscious choice involved; things like the DB25 connector may
- just have been "the way you do it" at that time.
-
- : Whether the SCSI specs agree or not, this is what IS for the A3000.
-
- Oh no, not again. Please don't think that I'm running down the A3000,
- because I'm not. I'm trying to convince people that SCSI works better if
- you follow the rules. A SCSI bus set up as per the C= documents you
- describe may work, but it will more likely work, and work reliably, if
- you know the rules and follow them.
-
- : My 3000 has operated for 5 years now with no problems on the SCSI bus
- : because I am playing by the rules of the hardware at my disposal, rather
- : than the specs that this hardware doesn't agree with. I've been through
- : more SCSI reconfigurations on my 3000 than my car has had tune-ups.
-
- I'm not certain what this shows, but if we're talking examples:
-
- A friend of mine had an old single-speed CD-ROM drive which he wanted to
- attach to a 2091 (very similar controller circuitry to what is in the
- A3000, including the same WD SCSI chip). He didn't want to remove the
- soldered-in terminators on the 2091. So we tried adding the (external)
- CD-ROM without termination. Didn't work. Tried other combinations.
- Didn't work. At all. I asked about the termination he had on the other
- end of the chain. It had been wrong, so we changed it. Still didn't
- work at all. Finally, he agreed to removing the terminators from the
- 2091. The CD-ROM worked, and perfectly, only when the termination was
- exactly as the SCSI spec describes.
-
- What I'm trying to say is that as more SCSI devices are added, and as the
- bus length grows, accurate termination becomes more and more critical.
-
- : It's an abberation, which I think I implied, granted. But since we have
- : to play by ITS rules....
-
- The aberration was on the part of the documentation you described; please
- don't force the A3000 to fit into that mold.
-
- : > As for C=, well, they went out of business due to
- : >stupidity...
-
- : Am I to infer, then, that you have a low opinion of the OS because of the
- : actions of Medhi Ali? What have the poor business decisions of one man
- : to do with the design decisions of the A3000? Phbt.
-
- I was trying to infer that C= may have (and indeed, did) make mistakes in
- some things, and that's how I would classify these documents you
- describe. Now that I think about it, it may have been a way of avoiding
- blame for not socketting the terminators. The user may take a dim view
- of a manual telling them they have to unsolder a SIP when the SCSI bus
- has both internal and external devices.
-
- : > but I suspect that the bulletin was referring to the lack of
- : >motherboard termination in most A3000s, and terminating one end of the
- : >internal and external "chains".
-
- : No, it was not. I may not be able to quote you the technical bulletin
- : number of the thing, but I know what the technical aspects are, as well
- : as the diagram that was on it. CLEARLY stated that the motherboard
- : terminations should be left in place, and that the internal AND external
- : chains must be terminated at thier respective ends, too.
-
- : >Some A3000s will work fine with non-spec SCSI setups.
-
- : The A3000 is a non-spec system from the very start.
-
- Huh? In what way is the A3000 SCSI non-standard, other than a minor flaw
- in the way it is documented? Please be specific.
-
- : > That doesn't mean
- : >that the settings are proper,
-
- : The settings are proper for that machine, only, and do not necessarilly
- : apply to any other model, including the T.
-
- Consider that the A3000 uses a standard SCSI controller chip attached to a
- standard SCSI bus, to be used for attaching standard SCSI peripherals.
- Note that the SCSI controller chip is what speaks to the SCSI bus, not
- some custom A3000 circuitry.
-
- : >range in which some machines will still work. In such situations, many
- : >people experience random "read errors" and believe that they are just a
- : >part of normal operation.
-
- : Every experience I have encountered like this has been because of a
- : failing drive, not the bus proper. My original Quantum drive eventually
- : started doing this. They do age. They do not last forever.
-
- And almost every experience of this I have encountered has been due to
- improper SCSI termination, which is far more common than drives wearing
- out, and happens to brand new drives as well. It's usually pretty
- identifiable: the errors are random, and SCSI bus lockups may be common,
- too ("common" meaning if it happens *at all*).
-
- : >2. The motherboard terminators are usually missing, and it's difficult
- : > to find the exact replacements, because (like the 2091) they are of
- : > two different sizes.
-
- : Interesting. Again, this flies directly in the face of my direct
- : experiences. Every A3000 I have opened up has had the terminators firmly
- : affixed to the motherboard, and only a good quality soldering iron will
- : ever free them. What revision motherboard are we talking about here?
-
- Dunno what revision; this is based on posts in c.s.a.h and email I've
- received from several A3000 owners. Incidentally, it may be easier to break
- out the SIPs by flexing them back and forth than unsoldering. (If you
- later decide to replace them with sockets, that's still possible.)
-
- : >3. Terminator power to the external DB25 (see #1) is often nonexistent
- : > due to a manfacturing flaw. This can be corrected.
-
- : What is the nature of this flaw? A blown fuse?
-
- No, although that's a reasonable guess, given that with a minimum of three
- termination loads you are closer to blowing the termpower protection fuse.
- The protection diode (D801) is backwards in many A3000s, as is the
- silkscreen, so--no termpower. Check pin 25 of the DB25 for +5V to verify.
-
- : >4. The revision 04 Western Digital SCSI chip has trouble with some SCSI
- : > devices. Replacing it with a revision 08 may be necessary.
-
- : I've never had the need for this one, and hopefully won't before I get a
- : new machine. Just lucky, I guess :-)
-
- It seems that some CD-ROMs and tape drives are most sensitive to the -04
- chip.
-
- Note: The SCSI Examples document is available by email to anyone who has
- had the fortitude to read this far. (Or not, but then, how would you have
- seen this? 8-)
-
- --
- .----------------------------------------------------------------.
- | Warren R. Block * New EMail Address: wblock@rapidnet.com |
- | Rapid City SD USA * Brought to you in majestic INEMASCOP! |
- `----------------------------------------------------------------'
-